Thursday, June 21, 2012

Amazon Launches New Talent

Amazon has launched the career of yet another author, one who says, in passing:

And I can assure you that freedom fuels creativity, risk-taking, and passion. We get to bring you our stories in the way we want to tell them, without the dilution and sculpting from publishing houses. 

Just so.  When I had an agent in the 1980's I was told to never write more than 2 chapters and an outline, because the publisher would want to "shape the book."  I took that to mean censor it and change it to support the beast. The old model is built on a free press in which the industry is given in essence tax exempt status if the industry will in turn only proffer books that support the regime.

IN the Soviet Union you could go to prison for writing something critical.  In USA if you write something critical is will not see the light of day.  But but but...  anyone can publish anything!  Yes, but will it get distribution?

A big reason I left iUniverse was they said my book sold exceptionally well, and they would get behind it if I changed it.  Wait, what?  I have that in writing.

Things might be changing.  Self-publishing may actually work, what with the reach of the internet.


Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Khan Academy & the Future

Here is an interesting exchange on education:


Is there anything to be done about the rising price of higher education? That was the question posed to John Hennessy, president of Stanford University, and Salman Khan, founder of Khan Academy, a nonprofit online-learning organization. They sat down with The Wall Street Journal's Walt Mossberg to discuss how technology might be part of the solution.
Here are edited excerpts of their conversation.
Cost Curve
MR. MOSSBERG: Is it either moral or sustainable for elite colleges and universities to be charging what is approaching $60,000 a year to go to college?

MR. HENNESSY: I think the real question is whether or not what we're charging is a worthwhile investment for the American public and for families. That's the key question. 

***Why did he not answer Mossberg’s question? This is an example of the elite at work.  Even if the right question si asked, they shift it away to a different question.  So much in life is just asking the right question.***

The elites (schools) have the advantage in that they have been able to significantly subsidize what they charge with financial aid. It's a really interesting business we're in. First we charge less than it costs us to provide an education, because we subsidize everybody to some extent. And then if you can't afford it, we give you a discount.

***Asonishingly disingenuiness.  You may charge less than you spend, but not less than it costs.  You endowments are tax exempt. which is a subsidy from those who do pay taxes.***

MR. MOSSBERG: You have a lot of money at Stanford. I've been, until recently, a trustee of Brandeis University. It's a very good university. It charges about what you do. But it doesn't have your money, and there are a lot of colleges like that.

MR. HENNESSY: Agreed, and if you look at the vast majority of colleges in the U.S., there are way too many that are [dependent on tuition to fund their budgets]. That is not sustainable. We have to do something to bend the cost curve, and this is where technology comes in.

***Why is living within your means not sustainable?  Only a college president would say this.  True, technology lowers costs.  But what costs, and what technology?   There is a scam going on where state schools are pawning off online classes as “education.”***

MR. KHAN: 
There is a fundamental disconnect happening between the providers of education and the consumers of education. If you ask universities what they are charging the $60,000 for, they'll say, "Look at our research facilities. Look at our faculty. Look at the labs and everything else." And then if you ask the parents and the students why they are taking on $60,000 of debt, they'll say, "Well, I need the credential. I need a job."
So one party thinks they're selling a very kind of an enriching experience, and the other one thinks that they're buying a credential. And if you ask the universities what percentages of your costs are "credentialing," they say oh, maybe 5% to 10%. And so I think there's an opportunity if we could decouple those things—if the credentialing part could happen for significantly less.

***This is the old teaching school versus research school debate.  But Khan has it right, the credential could be delivered for far less.  BUt I find it appalling that any parent would send a kid to school so they could “get a job.”***

MR. MOSSBERG: What do you mean by the credentialing part?
MR. KHAN: If you think about what education is, it's a combination. There's a learning part. You learn accounting, you learn to write better, to think, whatever. Then there is a credentialing part, where I'm going to hand you something that you can go take into the market and signal to people that you know what you're doing.
Right now they're very muddled, but this whole online debate or what's happening now is actually starting to clarify things. At Khan Academy we're 100% focused on the learning side of things. And I think it would be interesting [if credentials could be earned based on what you know and not on where you acquired that knowledge].

*** Credentials, or accrediatation is the Berlin Wall of education.  There are no student loans without accreditation - to get accrdited you must have certian books in alibrary, use certain txts, a whole ecology of that which orients peple to the needs of the powers that be,***

MR. MOSSBERG: The highest rates of tuition increase have been at public institutions. Out-of-state students going to these public universities are paying $25,000 to $30,000 now?
MR. HENNESSY: The biggest tragedy is if you pay that and don't get your degree. We need to deal with this problem. Costs are going up because educational institutions are driven by wages.

***I think this would be news to 99.5% of the college professors.  Again, I am astonished any college president would say this.***

MR. HENNESSY: We started with the view that the large lecture no longer works for this generation of students. So the whole flip classroom idea is something that's appealing. That simply means you do the lecture online and use the classroom to do something that's more interactive and more engaging.
We put some of this stuff online and then all of a sudden we got 100,000 students around the world signed up. We've learned a bunch of things. One of the phenomenal things we saw in our experiment was how quickly the community would answer questions when students in the class posed them. What I told my colleagues is there's a tsunami coming. I can't tell you exactly how it's going to break, but my goal is to try to surf it, not to just stand there.

***We’ve seen this model before, it is called the Globe Theatre.***http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303640104577440513369994278.html